Why Liberalism Failed, by Patrick J. Deneen

The book is short, the prose is lucid, and the topic engaging. And I disagree with almost every word.

Political theorist Patrick J. Deneen argues that liberalism has failed because it has succeeded. However, after having read his book, I am not sure what it is about liberalism that has failed. It seems that its ”failure” is that liberalism is not conservatism.

Liberalism builds on an institutionalized moral individualism that protects and liberates people from cultural and historical necessities. In my opinion, liberalism is one of the greatest collective achievements of mankind.

As a conservative, Deneen instead wants politics to protect and preserve culture and tradition. He seeks a world in which people remain constrained to their geographical birthplaces and to the social contexts in which they are born. That is true pluralism, Deneen argues.

As Deirdre McCloskey writes in her review, Why Liberalism Failed ”is directed at people who already agree with [the author].” But, McCloskey focuses on Deneen’s economic arguments, and barely mentions his illiberal system of values.

For instance, in contrast to the liberal theory of legitimacy building from individual consent, Deneen argues that ”culture itself is a deeper form of consent” which is ”passed along as a gift to future generations” (p. 190). He writes enthusiastically about a conception of liberty that is ”consistent with authority,” an authority that ”seeks to order society so that citizens are encouraged to make only those decisions and undertake actions that are oriented toward the ’just and good’” (p. 175).

Of course liberalism has failed if ”success” is understood as authoritarian collectivism.

In terms of academic stringency, Why Liberalism Failed is sometimes too speculative. Many claims and predictions lack sufficient empirical and theoretical support. Personally, I can live with that; I tend to be sympathetic to broad-stroked ideological writing. But, the book is also normatively inadequate. After almost 200 pages of complaining, Deneen ends up vaguely suggesting something similar to the ideal of deliberative democracy, and not much else. When I had read the concluding chapter I thought, ”is that it?”

Yet, I liked the book. Liberals in particular should read it, as it shows how some of our most important political opponents think. Why Liberalism Failed furthers an understanding not of the ”failure of liberalism,” but of the rise of 21th century conservatism. Study it closely. You may have to face reincarnations of its central tenets in the years to come.

Deneen, P. J. (2018). Why Liberalism Failed. Yale University Press.

4 svar till “Why Liberalism Failed, by Patrick J. Deneen”

  1. […] politiske teoretikern Patrick Deneen gästade nyligen Sverige för att tala om sin bok Why Liberalism Failed. En av Deneens teser är att liberalismens individualism underminerar samhällets små gemenskaper, […]

  2. […] Det pågår nu en intressant diskussion om individualism i svensk politik. Den konservative politiske teoretikern Patrick Deneen gästade i förra veckan Sverige för att diskutera religion och demokrati. I sin bok Why Liberalism Failed menar Deneen att individualismen är ett skäl till varför liberalismen fallerar – en teori som jag är skeptisk till och har diskuterat i en kort recension av Deneens bok här. […]

  3. […] argument har återupprepats i nya former de senaste åren. Till exempel menar filosofen Patrick Deneen att individualismen har lossat de sociala banden mellan människor i nästan alla aspekter, vilket […]

  4. […] angriper den liberala individualismen i sin bok Why Liberalism Failed. Han söker ett frihetsbegrepp ”som är förenligt med auktoritet”. Det vill säga att […]


Fyll i dina uppgifter nedan eller klicka på en ikon för att logga in:


Du kommenterar med ditt WordPress.com-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )


Du kommenterar med ditt Google-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )


Du kommenterar med ditt Twitter-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )


Du kommenterar med ditt Facebook-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )

Ansluter till %s